How do we surface for the disciplines and sectors buyers search?

By organizing services by discipline and projects by sector so the firm appears for specific searches — structural-for-healthcare, civil-for-land-development, and so on. See Nabee for engineering firms.

Can we speed up statements of qualifications?

Yes — a managed library of reusable project sheets, licensing, and certifications turns SOQ assembly from a day into an afternoon. See automation for engineering firms.

Can RFP requests route to the right principal?

Yes — a dedicated intake captures project type, jurisdiction, and scope and routes it by discipline instead of landing in a general inbox.

Do we need a platform or just a website?

Most firms start with a well-structured website to win work and add an internal pursuit/qualifications platform as pursuit volume grows.

WHO WE WORK WITH

Websites, apps & automation for engineering firms

Updated August 2026 · Nabee Studio

Nabee Studio builds custom websites, platforms, and automation for engineering firms — from $4,500 one-time or $499/mo for 24 months with maintenance and hosting included. One partner replaces the stack of vendors, template subscriptions, and manual work, so working with us saves money, time, or both.

Engineering firms — civil, structural, MEP, environmental — win work through demonstrated competence, and increasingly through search: a project owner or GC looks for a firm with the right discipline, sector, and jurisdiction experience. Yet many firm sites are static brochures that bury the disciplines, list no project experience, and give a procurement contact no fast way to request a proposal or qualifications.

The result is missed RFPs, an inbox full of misdirected inquiries, and technical staff pulled into assembling the same statements of qualifications and licensing information by hand, over and over.

Where engineering firms lose time and money online

Disciplines and sector experience are hard to find

Buyers search by discipline and sector — structural for healthcare, civil for land development. If the site doesn't organize services and projects that way, the firm doesn't surface for the searches that matter. Structured service and project pages make expertise findable.

RFP and qualification requests have no clear path

A GC or owner ready to request a proposal shouldn't have to hunt for a generic contact form. A dedicated RFP/qualifications request path that captures project type, jurisdiction, and scope routes the request to the right principal fast.

Statements of qualifications are rebuilt by hand

SOQs, licensing lists, and project sheets are assembled repeatedly for each pursuit. A managed library of reusable project sheets and credentials turns a day of assembly into an afternoon.

Licensing and certifications aren't surfaced credibly

Multi-state licensure, PE stamps, and certifications are decisive for buyers but often absent from the site. Presenting them clearly builds trust and answers procurement's due-diligence questions before they're asked.

What manual work does a custom build remove?

The typical engineering firm runs on manual touchpoints like these:

Organizing services as a flat list rather than by discipline and sector
Routing RFP and qualification requests through a generic contact form
Rebuilding statements of qualifications and project sheets for each pursuit
Maintaining licensing and certification lists across scattered documents
Manually tracking pursuits and proposal deadlines in spreadsheets
Distributing technical resources and case studies by request over email

Each of those is hours a week that a custom build turns into software:

Discipline + sector structure — Services and projects organized by discipline and sector so the firm surfaces for the specific searches buyers actually run.
RFP / qualifications intake — A dedicated request path capturing project type, jurisdiction, and scope that routes to the right principal instead of a general inbox.
Reusable project + credential library — A managed library of project sheets, licensing, and certifications that turns assembling a statement of qualifications from a day into an afternoon.
Credential presentation — Multi-state licensure, PE stamps, and certifications surfaced clearly so procurement's due-diligence questions are answered before they're asked.

Integrations that matter for engineering firms

CRM / pursuit tracking · Document & project-sheet management · Contact routing by discipline · Careers / applicant tracking · Analytics & search visibility · E-signature for agreements — built in, not bolted on with extra subscriptions.

What does it cost?

One scoping pass, one fixed number — no hourly billing. Firms managing pursuits, reusable qualifications, and client deliverables benefit from a logged-in platform; a smaller practice focused on visibility can start with a well-structured website.

Website — from $4,500 one-time (standard from $7,500), or $499/mo for 24 months with the Maintenance Plan and hosting included.
Platform — from $16,000 one-time, or $1,399/mo for 24 months with Website Update + Maintenance included.

The monthly plan totals somewhat more than paying up front — that's the honest trade for spreading the cost and having us operate everything for two years. Details in the payment plan guide and on the pricing page.

Start a project — describe your engineering firm and get a fixed quote after one scoping pass.

Common questions

How do we surface for the disciplines and sectors buyers search?: By organizing services by discipline and projects by sector so the firm appears for specific searches — structural-for-healthcare, civil-for-land-development, and so on. See Nabee for engineering firms.
Can we speed up statements of qualifications?: Yes — a managed library of reusable project sheets, licensing, and certifications turns SOQ assembly from a day into an afternoon. See automation for engineering firms.
Can RFP requests route to the right principal?: Yes — a dedicated intake captures project type, jurisdiction, and scope and routes it by discipline instead of landing in a general inbox.
Do we need a platform or just a website?: Most firms start with a well-structured website to win work and add an internal pursuit/qualifications platform as pursuit volume grows.